Strategy styles · Opening range breakout
Can an opening range breakout strategy pass Audacity Capital?
Yes, on most rule sets. On Audacity Capital Ability Challenge, our sample opening range trader passed 76% of attempts and went on to a first payout in 71%. That ranks Audacity Capital 19th of 46 firms with a challenge for this style; the middle challenge across all firms is 72%. The sample has a real edge built in, so read this as how Audacity Capital's rules treat the style, not as your own odds.
Audacity Capital accounts with an opening range breakout strategy
| Account | Type | Pass chance | Pass and get paid | Best risk a trade | Days | Most common way it failed | Target | Daily loss | Max loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability Challenge | 2-step | 76% | 71% | 1% | 95 | Hit the maximum loss | 10% / 5% | 5% | 10% static |
"Pass and get paid" is the share of attempts that passed every phase and then reached a first payout without breaking a rule. Days are trading days. Rules checked 8 Nov 2026; full rules on the Audacity Capital page.
Audacity Capital's rules are about average for this style. When the sample failed on Audacity Capital Ability Challenge, it was most often because it hit the maximum loss.
The sample opening range trader
Our sample wins 55% of its trades, each winner is the same size as the risk, each loser is the full risk, and it takes about one trade a day: an average of 0.1R profit per trade, where R is the amount risked. One trade a day, winners the same size as losers, and a little over half of them win. Results are steady because the day can only go one trade wrong. More on the sample and how it does across all firms.
Audacity Capital rules to watch with an opening range breakout strategy
We have not recorded Audacity Capital's rules on news trading yet, and they are not in the pass figures above. Check Audacity Capital's own rules before you buy.
- News at the open
- US data comes out at 8:30 and 10:00 New York time, either side of the 9:30 stock market open. A firm that bans trading around news can rule out the trade of the day.
- Slippage at the open
- The first minutes of a session are the fastest of the day. A stop order fills worse than the chart price more often here than anywhere else.
- One trade a day and consistency rules
- With one trade a day, a single good day can be a large share of the profit on a short challenge, which is what a best-day rule limits.
Other styles at Audacity Capital
| Style | Best account | Pass chance | Pass and get paid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breakout | Ability Challenge | 64% | 59% |
| Trend following | Ability Challenge | 73% | 67% |
| Mean reversion | Ability Challenge | 69% | 65% |
| Scalping | Ability Challenge | 49% | 42% |
| Swing trading | Ability Challenge | 88% | 85% |
| Opening range breakout (this one) | Ability Challenge | 76% | 71% |
| Day trading | Ability Challenge | 50% | 41% |
| High win rate | Ability Challenge | 86% | 83% |
| Low win rate | Ability Challenge | 59% | 52% |
| Position trading | Ability Challenge | 84% | 80% |
| Grid and martingale | Ability Challenge | 33% | 29% |
Firms whose rules suit this style better
- FTUK Flex Challenge: 86% passed
- Bullwaves Prime 1-Step 100K: 83% passed Caution
- Hola Prime 2-Step Pro 100K: 83% passed
Ranked on the rules alone. It says nothing about how reliably a firm pays: see payout reports and each firm's page.
How this was worked out
Each style is a made-up sample trader, not a real track record. We set the figures so that every sample makes the same average profit: 0.1 times its risk per trading day, about 2R a month. They differ only in shape: how often they win, how big the winners are and how many trades they take. That way a difference between two styles comes from how the rules treat the shape, not from one sample simply being better. The exception is the grid and martingale sample, which has no edge at all: adding to losing trades changes the shape of the results but cannot create an edge.
Each sample was run 1,000 times against each account's published rules, at nine trade sizes from 0.13% to 1% of the account, and we show the size that did best. It is the same engine as the test centre. How the simulation works.
What this leaves out. Every sample but that one has a real edge and never breaks its own rules, which is why these figures are far higher than the share of real traders who pass. There are no spreads, commissions, swaps or slippage. Every winner and loser is the same size. And it only tests the rules in the table: profit targets, loss limits, trading days, time limits, consistency and payout terms, not rules on news, weekends or hold times. A strategy with no edge fails everywhere, whatever its style.
Questions
Can an opening range breakout strategy pass Audacity Capital?
Yes, on most rule sets. On Audacity Capital Ability Challenge, our sample opening range trader passed 76% of attempts and went on to a first payout in 71%. That ranks Audacity Capital 19th of 46 firms with a challenge for this style; the middle challenge across all firms is 72%. The sample has a real edge built in; a strategy without one fails at any firm.
Which Audacity Capital account is best for an opening range breakout strategy?
PropPassCheck tracks one Audacity Capital account, Audacity Capital Ability Challenge.
How much should I risk per trade at Audacity Capital with an opening range breakout strategy?
For our sample the best size on Audacity Capital Ability Challenge was 1% of the account per trade, and a typical pass took 95 trading days. Your own best size depends on your win rate and losing runs, so test your own trades.
Test your own trades
These are samples. Your strategy has its own win rate, its own losing runs and its own costs. Upload a backtest or trade history and PropPassCheck replays it 2,000 times against each Audacity Capital account and every other firm, and shows your own chance of passing and of a first payout. It runs in your browser; nothing is uploaded.