Can a breakout strategy pass AquaFunded?
Often, but the rules decide it. On AquaFunded 2 Step Standard, our sample breakout trader passed 61% of attempts and went on to a first payout in 55%. That ranks AquaFunded 21st of 46 firms with a challenge for this style; the middle challenge across all firms is 59%. The sample has a real edge built in, so read this as how AquaFunded's rules treat the style, not as your own odds.
AquaFunded accounts with a breakout strategy
| Account | Type | Pass chance | Pass and get paid | Best risk a trade | Days | Most common way it failed | Target | Daily loss | Max loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Step Standard | 2-step | 61% | 55% | 0.63% | 92 | Hit the maximum loss | 8% / 5% | 5% | 8% static |
| Instant Funding Standard | Instant funding | No challenge | 61% | 0.38% | 49 | Hit the maximum loss | None | 3% | 5% trailing |
"Pass and get paid" is the share of attempts that passed every phase and then reached a first payout without breaking a rule. Days are trading days. Rules checked 13 Nov 2026; full rules on the AquaFunded page.
AquaFunded's rules are about average for this style. When the sample failed on AquaFunded 2 Step Standard, it was most often because it hit the maximum loss.
The sample breakout trader
Our sample wins 36.7% of its trades, each winner is 2 times the risk, each loser is the full risk, and it takes about one trade a day: an average of 0.1R profit per trade, where R is the amount risked. Few winners, big winners. Runs of five or six losses in a row are normal, so the maximum loss has to be deep enough to sit through them. More on the sample and how it does across all firms.
AquaFunded rules to watch with a breakout strategy
We have not recorded AquaFunded's rules on news trading yet, and they are not in the pass figures above. Check AquaFunded's own rules before you buy.
- News rules
- Breakouts often fire at the session open or straight after a data release, which is exactly when some firms ban trading or stop counting the profit.
- Slippage
- A stop order in a fast market fills worse than the price on the chart. A backtest that ignores it flatters a breakout strategy more than most.
- Trailing drawdown
- A big winner lifts a trailing floor. The losing run that follows then starts from a higher floor than it would on a static account.
Other styles at AquaFunded
| Style | Best account | Pass chance | Pass and get paid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breakout (this one) | 2 Step Standard | 61% | 55% |
| Trend following | 2 Step Standard | 72% | 67% |
| Mean reversion | 2 Step Standard | 68% | 63% |
| Scalping | 2 Step Standard | 51% | 46% |
| Swing trading | 2 Step Standard | 85% | 81% |
| Opening range breakout | 2 Step Standard | 78% | 73% |
| Day trading | 2 Step Standard | 48% | 40% |
| High win rate | 2 Step Standard | 85% | 82% |
| Low win rate | 2 Step Standard | 60% | 54% |
| Position trading | 2 Step Standard | 82% | 78% |
| Grid and martingale | 2 Step Standard | 33% | 28% |
Firms whose rules suit this style better
- FTUK Flex Challenge: 77% passed
- Bullwaves Prime 1-Step 100K: 72% passed Caution
- Instant Funding One-Phase Pro: 71% passed
Ranked on the rules alone. It says nothing about how reliably a firm pays: see payout reports and each firm's page.
How this was worked out
Each style is a made-up sample trader, not a real track record. We set the figures so that every sample makes the same average profit: 0.1 times its risk per trading day, about 2R a month. They differ only in shape: how often they win, how big the winners are and how many trades they take. That way a difference between two styles comes from how the rules treat the shape, not from one sample simply being better. The exception is the grid and martingale sample, which has no edge at all: adding to losing trades changes the shape of the results but cannot create an edge.
Each sample was run 1,000 times against each account's published rules, at nine trade sizes from 0.13% to 1% of the account, and we show the size that did best. It is the same engine as the test centre. How the simulation works.
What this leaves out. Every sample but that one has a real edge and never breaks its own rules, which is why these figures are far higher than the share of real traders who pass. There are no spreads, commissions, swaps or slippage. Every winner and loser is the same size. And it only tests the rules in the table: profit targets, loss limits, trading days, time limits, consistency and payout terms, not rules on news, weekends or hold times. A strategy with no edge fails everywhere, whatever its style.
Questions
Can a breakout strategy pass AquaFunded?
Often, but the rules decide it. On AquaFunded 2 Step Standard, our sample breakout trader passed 61% of attempts and went on to a first payout in 55%. That ranks AquaFunded 21st of 46 firms with a challenge for this style; the middle challenge across all firms is 59%. The sample has a real edge built in; a strategy without one fails at any firm.
Which AquaFunded account is best for a breakout strategy?
AquaFunded 2 Step Standard did best in our runs (61% passed). AquaFunded Instant Funding Standard: 61% reached a first payout.
How much should I risk per trade at AquaFunded with a breakout strategy?
For our sample the best size on AquaFunded 2 Step Standard was 0.63% of the account per trade, and a typical pass took 92 trading days. Your own best size depends on your win rate and losing runs, so test your own trades.
Test your own trades
These are samples. Your strategy has its own win rate, its own losing runs and its own costs. Upload a backtest or trade history and PropPassCheck replays it 2,000 times against each AquaFunded account and every other firm, and shows your own chance of passing and of a first payout. It runs in your browser; nothing is uploaded.